OER Fit: English

See what each English rubric is actually looking for.

Start with the plain-language questions for your course. When you need exact rating thresholds, calibration guidance, or the complete rubric, open the dedicated course rubric.

Read the rubric in about 30 seconds

The quick questions tell you what each criterion is trying to detect. They are a reading aid, not a substitute for the full course rubric. Use the dedicated rubric page when you need exact rating boundaries or calibration notes.

Strong alignmentSubstantial, explicit instruction that can carry a meaningful share of teaching in that area.
Meaningful alignmentUseful direct instruction, but some range, depth, or support may still need supplementation.
Limited alignmentThe topic appears, but treatment is brief, secondary, or not enough to teach it independently.
Not a significant focusLittle or no direct instruction in that area.

No overall score or winner is calculated. Each criterion stays separate so faculty can decide which kinds of coverage matter for their own course design.

ENGL C1000

Academic Reading and Writing

Start with the questions below. Open the dedicated course rubric when you need exact rating thresholds or calibration notes.

What we look for, in plain language

These questions summarize the intent of each criterion. Use the full course rubric for the exact rating language.

Academic Reading
Does the OER explicitly teach students how to read, annotate, question, summarize, and analyze college-level texts?
Rhetoric & Rhetorical Awareness
Does it teach audience, purpose, context, genre, and rhetorical choices, not just name the terms?
Writing Process
Does it support invention, drafting, feedback, revision, editing, and reflection as connected stages?
Academic Genres
Does it teach how college writing works across more than one genre or rhetorical situation?
Research & Source Use
Does it teach inquiry, source evaluation, integration, and synthesis rather than only quotation?
Documentation
Does it give usable instruction and models for citation, attribution, and works cited or references?
Language & Style
Does it connect clarity, voice, tone, sentences, and usage to rhetorical purpose rather than correctness alone?

ENGL C1001

Critical Thinking and Writing

Start with the questions below. Open the dedicated course rubric when you need exact rating thresholds or calibration notes.

What we look for, in plain language

These questions summarize the intent of each criterion. Use the full course rubric for the exact rating language.

Critical Reading
Does it teach students to identify, analyze, and evaluate claims, evidence, assumptions, and reasoning in complex nonfiction?
Argument & Rhetoric
Does it explicitly teach how arguments work rhetorically and how students can build their own?
Logic & Reasoning
Does it teach reasoning patterns and how to assess whether conclusions follow from evidence?
Biases & Fallacies
Does it teach students to recognize bias and common reasoning errors in context?
Research & Source Evaluation
Does it teach students to find, evaluate, and question sources as part of inquiry?
Evidence & Documentation
Does it show how to use evidence responsibly, integrate sources, and document them?
Writing & Revision
Does it help students develop, test, and revise arguments rather than only produce a final essay?
Diverse & Complex Nonfiction
Does it give students substantial work with complex nonfiction from varied voices, contexts, and perspectives?

ENGL C1002

Introduction to Literature

Start with the questions below. Open the dedicated course rubric when you need exact rating thresholds or calibration notes.

What we look for, in plain language

These questions summarize the intent of each criterion. Use the full course rubric for the exact rating language.

Literary Breadth
Does it provide enough range of literature to support an introductory literature course?
Poetry
Does it include substantial poetry and enough support to teach students how to read and analyze it?
Drama
Does it include substantial drama and enough support to teach students how to read and analyze it?
Fiction
Does it include substantial fiction and enough support to teach students how to read and analyze it?
Diverse Literary Voices
Does the literary selection include varied cultural, historical, and social perspectives?
Literary Terms & Critical Approaches
Does it teach the concepts and interpretive lenses students need to discuss literature?
Close Reading & Literary Analysis
Does it explicitly teach students how to move from textual detail to an interpretive claim?
Research & Writing about Literature
Does it support thesis development, primary-text evidence, secondary research, documentation, drafting, and revision?

ENGL C1003

Critical Thinking and Writing through Literature

Start with the questions below. Open the dedicated course rubric when you need exact rating thresholds or calibration notes.

What we look for, in plain language

These questions summarize the intent of each criterion. Use the full course rubric for the exact rating language.

Literary Breadth
Does it provide enough literature to sustain the course’s literary study?
Diverse Literary Voices
Does the literary selection include varied cultural, historical, and social perspectives?
Close Reading & Literary Analysis
Does it teach students how to analyze textual evidence and build interpretations?
Argument & Thesis Development
Does it explicitly teach arguable claims and sustained thesis-driven writing about literature?
Logic & Critical Reasoning
Does it explicitly teach reasoning, assumptions, evidence, and evaluation rather than only asking students to “think critically”?
Biases & Fallacies
Does it teach bias and fallacies explicitly enough for students to recognize and evaluate them?
Critical Approaches & Context
Does it help students interpret literature through critical lenses and historical or cultural context?
Research & Source Evaluation
Does it teach how to find, evaluate, and use secondary sources in literary research?
Writing, Revision & Documentation
Does it support drafting, substantive revision, and responsible citation in literary arguments?