1. Do not paste private student information
Do not enter student names, grades, attendance, accommodation or disability information, identifiable student work, or other private or sensitive information.
Choose a task, fill in only what matters, copy the prepared prompt into the AI tool you use, and review the result.
AI helps with the first pass. Important verification and academic judgment stay human.
If you have used an AI chat tool before, this is probably all you need.
That is enough to start. A prompt is simply an instruction to an AI tool. The Promptbook writes the instruction for you.
Do not enter student names, grades, attendance, accommodation or disability information, identifiable student work, or other private or sensitive information.
Verify important titles, links, licenses, access conditions, accessibility information, and current details at the original or authoritative source.
A resource can be free to read or available through a library without giving you permission to revise, remix, or redistribute it.
AI can organize evidence and tradeoffs. Faculty and the appropriate campus professionals make curricular, licensing, accessibility, and adoption decisions.
You do not need a particular brand. You only need a tool that can work with the information the task requires.
A general AI chat tool can usually help organize, compare, summarize, or analyze what you provide.
Use a tool with current web access. If it cannot open the source page, it should not describe the source as verified.
A COR is a Course Outline of Record. File upload can save time with a COR, syllabus, or other long document. Otherwise, paste only the sections relevant to the task.
Use current institutional sources or the appropriate person. AI should not guess local library holdings, approved tools, ZTC designation rules, adoption procedures, or policy. If you are unsure who handles the question, use AI to help you draft the question, not to invent the local answer.
| What happened | What to try |
|---|---|
| The answer is too generic. | Add one useful detail, such as the topic, learning goal, or most important constraint. |
| The AI gives too many resources. | Ask for the 3 strongest candidates and direct original-source links. |
| The links look suspicious or do not work. | Stop. Verify the candidate list before evaluating anything. |
| The tool cannot access the page or file. | Paste the relevant text, upload the document if permitted, or use a tool with the needed access. |
| The answer sounds confident but has no evidence. | Ask for the source for each important claim and label unsupported claims “Needs verification.” |
| The response is much longer than you need. | Ask for a short table, the top 3 findings, or the next 2 things to check yourself. |
Still not working? The Advanced Workflows page has optional troubleshooting prompts. You do not need them unless the simple fix fails.
Your librarian or library system confirms local holdings, subscriptions, concurrent-user limits, off-campus access, and stable linking.
AI can surface documented information. It cannot certify that a resource meets your institution's accessibility obligations.
Your Course Outline of Record (COR), Common Course Numbering (CCN) or C-ID requirements, syllabus, and current local curriculum documents remain authoritative.
If your department uses a common text, coordinated course, required materials, or a local adoption process, confirm what you can change before doing substantial replacement work. Your chair, program lead, department, or local policy may be the right source.
Follow your college or district's current guidance about approved tools, protected information, and institutional use.
You do not need to read more about AI before you begin. Start with Quick and verify what matters.